দাগ
Civic Accountability Archive · Bangladesh

Every word
leaves a mark.

Daag is a verified public archive documenting misogynistic, victim-blaming, and abusive comments made by named individuals on social media about incidents of gender violence in Bangladesh.

--
Entries Archived
--
Under Review
--
Appeals Filed
--
Verified Rate

Perpetrators leave traces.
We preserve them.

Every submission goes through editorial review before publication. We document the people behind the comments and build a verified, searchable record of who said what, and when.

01
Evidence Submission Portal
Structured intake for public URLs, screenshots, and contextual notes. All submissions go through moderation before they become public.
02
Editorial Moderation
A trained team reviews every submission for authenticity, context, and category accuracy before archiving. Nothing is published automatically.
03
AI-Assisted Classification
NLP toxicity scoring gives moderators supporting signals. All AI results are clearly labeled as advisory and are not treated as final decisions.
04
Searchable Public Archive
Filter by category, incident type, date, and severity. Screenshots are blurred by default. Entries include full context and annotations.
05
Appeals & Dispute System
Any individual can dispute a submission. All appeals get a human review with documented reasoning. Successful appeals lead to removal or reclassification.
06
Pattern Analytics
Data journalism covering category trends, incident timelines, and language patterns. Published for research, advocacy, and journalism.

Common Questions

No. Submitter information (email, relationship to incident) is never displayed publicly. It is stored only for internal moderation purposes and follow-up if clarification is needed. Your identity is not linked to published archive entries in any way.
Most submissions are reviewed within 3 to 5 working days. During high-volume periods, it may take slightly longer. You will receive a reference ID upon submission that you can use to track your submission's status.
Your submission enters a moderation queue where it is reviewed by a trained moderator. They verify the URL, confirm the screenshot is genuine, assess the category and severity, and either approve, reject, or request additional context. Nothing is published until a human has reviewed it.
No. The archived individual can see only the public archive entry, which contains their public comment, category, and incident context. They cannot see who submitted the evidence or any submitter contact information.
Anyone can file a formal appeal through our Appeals system. A separate moderation panel (not the original reviewer) examines the evidence and grounds for dispute within 14 working days. If the appeal is upheld, the entry is removed or reclassified with full documentation.
Facebook is the dominant social media platform in Bangladesh where the majority of public discourse around gender violence incidents takes place. We are focused on doing one platform well with rigorous verification before expanding. Support for other platforms may be considered in the future.

The stain of words,
not the stain of vengeance

Platform Philosophy
Daag is not a shaming tool, a vigilante platform, or a harassment engine. It is an evidence archive built on dignity, transparency, and responsible documentation. Every design and editorial decision reflects this commitment.
Who Can Appeal
Anyone who believes a submission is inaccurate, missing context, or made in bad faith can file a formal dispute. A separate moderation panel reviews all appeals within 14 working days.
Privacy Boundaries
We document only publicly visible comments from public posts. We do not archive private profile data, contact information, or content from closed groups. All screenshots are verified for authenticity before publication.

Document a Comment

Seen a misogynistic, victim-blaming, or abusive comment on a public Facebook post about gender violence? Submit it here. All submissions stay private until reviewed by our editorial team.

Submission Standards
Only submit publicly visible comments from public posts or pages. Do not submit content from private groups, direct messages, or closed conversations. Fabricated or manipulated screenshots will lead to a permanent submission ban.
Contributor Guidelines
What to submit: Publicly visible comments from public Facebook posts or pages that contain misogynistic, victim-blaming, threatening, or dehumanizing language related to incidents of gender violence in Bangladesh.
What NOT to submit: Private messages, content from closed groups, comments unrelated to gender violence, personal disputes, political disagreements that do not involve gender-based abuse, or any content you have fabricated or manipulated.
Screenshot requirements: Screenshots must be unedited, uncropped, and unannotated. They must clearly show the comment text, the commenter's profile name, and the post context. Timestamps should be visible where possible. Do not redact or highlight any portion.
Accuracy expectations: Select the most accurate abuse category and incident type. If unsure, err on the side of caution and add a contextual note explaining your uncertainty. Moderators will reclassify if needed.
Submitter responsibility: By submitting, you confirm the evidence is genuine and unmanipulated. False submissions waste moderator time and undermine the archive's credibility. Repeated false submissions will result in permanent restriction.
Evidence Submission Form
All fields marked * are required. Your submission enters a moderation queue immediately and will not become public until reviewed.
Two URLs Required
1
Perpetrator's Profile URL
The Facebook profile page of the person who made the abusive comment
2
Source Post URL
The public post or news article where you found and identified the comment
Direct link to the commenter's Facebook profile
The public post or article where you found the abusive comment
Drop screenshot here or click to browse
PNG, JPG or WEBP · Max 10MB · No editing, cropping, or annotation
Submitter Reference (Optional)
This information is never published and is only used internally for moderation accountability and follow-up if clarification is needed.
Never displayed publicly. Used only for moderation follow-up.
Submissions are reviewed before any public display

The Record

All entries have passed editorial moderation. Screenshots are blurred by default. This archive is a public record, not a tool for harassment or pile-ons.

Incident Type
All Rape / Sexual Violence Domestic Violence Acid Violence Cyber Harassment Public Harassment Gender Violence
Severity
All Severe High Moderate
All Entries Victim Blaming Misogyny Violent Rhetoric Dehumanizing Threats This Week
Showing 0 of 0 verified entries · Load more →
Archive Use Notice: This archive is intended for research, advocacy, journalism, and public awareness. Redistribution of individual entries for purposes of harassment, pile-ons, or vigilante action is a violation of our Terms of Use and may count as online abuse under the law.

What the Data Shows

All data comes from verified archive entries only. Updated weekly. Figures are shown at the aggregate level. No individual-level data is published here.

0
Total Archived
0
In Moderation
0%
Verified Rate
0
Appeals Filed
Monthly Submissions
Category Distribution
Incident Type Breakdown
Data reflects verified entries only. Category assignments are made by trained human moderators. AI classification data is used internally to support moderators and is not included in these published figures.

File a Formal Dispute

If you believe a submission involving you is inaccurate, missing critical context, or was submitted in bad faith, you can file a formal appeal. A panel separate from the original moderator reviews all appeals within 14 working days.

Dispute Submission
All appeals are treated confidentially. Review typically completed within 14 working days.
Please enter a valid archive entry ID
Found in the URL or bottom of any archive entry
Please select the grounds for your appeal
Please provide a supporting statement
Upload supporting screenshots, links, or documents
Max 10MB · PDF, PNG, JPG accepted
Appeal Submitted
Your appeal has been received and assigned to a review panel. You will be notified of the outcome within 14 working days.

Appeals are reviewed by a separate panel
Enter your appeal ID above to check its current review status

Why Daag Exists

In Bangla, দাগ means stain, the kind that does not wash off. The name is deliberate. When men post victim-blaming, misogynistic, or violent commentary on public Facebook posts about gender violence, that behavior should leave a record. This project was built in response to a pattern: when incidents of rape, acid violence, or domestic abuse happen in Bangladesh, the comment sections fill with cruelty and then disappear. Daag exists to make sure they do not.

Online cruelty
after violence

When news of a rape, acid attack, or domestic violence case spreads on Facebook, the comment sections often become a second site of violence. Victims are blamed for their clothing, behavior, family background, and character. Perpetrators are defended. Survivors are silenced.

These comments disappear quickly. They get moderated, deleted, or buried by newer content. But while they exist, they shape public discourse, discourage survivors from speaking, and signal to perpetrators that their community supports them.

Daag exists to preserve a systematic record of this discourse, not for outrage but for understanding. It is built for researchers, journalists, advocates, and policymakers who need evidence to make the case for change.


How Daag Works

Every entry in the Daag archive goes through a structured review process before publication. Submissions are first screened by AI-assisted tools that check for duplicate content, image authenticity, and URL validity. This automated layer reduces the burden on human reviewers and flags potential issues early.

After initial screening, each submission is reviewed by a human moderator who verifies the source, confirms the comment is from a public post, assesses the category and severity, and ensures the submission meets our editorial standards. Moderators can approve, reject, request additional context, or place submissions on hold for further review.

This combination of AI-assisted screening and human editorial judgment allows us to maintain accuracy at scale while ensuring that every published entry has been reviewed by a person who understands the context. No entry is published without human approval.


Principles

Transparency
Our methodology, moderation criteria, and data handling practices are documented and publicly accessible. We publish aggregate statistics about submissions, approvals, and appeals so the public can evaluate our work.
Dignity
Even when documenting harmful speech, we design every aspect of this platform to avoid becoming a tool for harassment or mob justice. Archive entries preserve evidence; they do not call for action against individuals. We do not publish private information.
Accuracy
Every submission is verified before publication. We cross-check URLs, validate screenshots, and confirm that archived comments were posted publicly. If an error is discovered after publication, we correct or remove the entry and document the correction.
Accountability
We hold ourselves to the same standard we apply to the content we document. Anyone can file an appeal to challenge an entry. Appeals are reviewed by a separate moderation panel within 14 working days, and outcomes are recorded transparently.

Have questions or feedback?

We welcome inquiries from researchers, journalists, advocates, and anyone interested in the project.

Contact Us

Terms of Use

By accessing or using the Daag platform, you agree to the following terms. Please read them carefully.

1. Purpose & Permitted Use

Daag is a civic accountability archive designed for research, journalism, advocacy, public awareness, and informed personal decisions. You may use this platform to search verified entries, submit evidence for review, file appeals, and access aggregated analytics data.

You may not use this platform to: harass, threaten, or intimidate any individual; organise or participate in coordinated pile-ons against archived individuals; redistribute archive content for purposes of vigilantism; create derivative platforms or datasets designed to circumvent our moderation safeguards; or scrape, crawl, or bulk-download archive data without express written permission.

2. Submission Responsibilities

By submitting evidence to Daag, you represent and warrant that: the screenshots you upload are genuine and unmanipulated; the URLs you provide link to publicly visible content; you have not fabricated, altered, or deceptively cropped any submitted material; and you are submitting in good faith for purposes consistent with the platform's mission.

You acknowledge that false submissions waste moderator resources, undermine the archive's credibility, and may constitute an offence under applicable laws. Daag reserves the right to permanently restrict submission access and refer evidence of fabrication to relevant authorities.

3. No Verdict / No Guarantee

Daag is a documentation platform, not a court of law. Archive entries represent verified public comments. They do not constitute a legal verdict, criminal finding, or character judgment of any individual.

While we take every reasonable step to verify submissions, we do not guarantee the absolute accuracy of every entry. We encourage users to treat archive data as one input among many in their own judgment. Daag expressly disclaims any representation that an archived entry is sufficient basis for legal, employment, or relationship decisions.

4. Intellectual Property

The Daag platform, including its design, branding, code, and editorial framework, is the intellectual property of the Daag project. Archive entries themselves are derived from publicly visible third-party content and are presented for documentation purposes under fair use / public interest principles.

You may cite, reference, or link to archive entries for journalistic, academic, or advocacy purposes with appropriate attribution. You may not reproduce the platform's design, replicate its database, or create competing services using Daag's data without written authorization.

5. Limitation of Liability

Daag is provided on an "as-is" basis. To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, the Daag project, its contributors, moderators, and advisors disclaim all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and non-infringement.

In no event shall Daag be liable for any indirect, incidental, special, consequential, or punitive damages arising from your use of the platform, reliance on archive data, or actions taken by third parties based on archived content.

6. Governing Law

These Terms of Use shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of Bangladesh. Any disputes arising from the use of this platform shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Daag reserves the right to update these terms at any time. Continued use of the platform following any modification constitutes acceptance of the revised terms. Users will be notified of material changes via a notice on the platform.

Last updated: June 2, 2026. These terms apply to all users of the Daag platform, including submitters, searchers, moderators, and visitors.

Privacy Policy

This policy explains what data we collect, how we use it, and your rights regarding your information on the Daag platform.

1. Information We Collect

When you use Daag, we may collect the following information depending on how you interact with the platform:

Submissions: Evidence you submit including screenshots, URLs, context notes, category selections, and optional contact email. Contact messages: Your name, email address, subject selection, and message content when you use the contact form. Search queries: Aggregate search patterns may be monitored to detect misuse, but individual queries are not stored or linked to identifiable users. Technical data: Basic request logs (IP address, browser type, timestamps) maintained by our hosting infrastructure for security purposes.

2. How We Use Your Information

We use collected information for the following purposes: to review and moderate evidence submissions; to respond to contact form messages and support requests; to process and resolve appeals; to maintain platform security and prevent abuse; to generate anonymised, aggregate analytics displayed publicly on the platform; and to improve the accuracy and reliability of the archive.

We do not use your information for advertising, marketing to third parties, or any purpose unrelated to the platform's civic accountability mission.

3. Data Retention

Different types of data are retained for different periods:

Contact emails: Messages submitted through the contact form are retained for 180 days, after which they are permanently deleted unless they relate to an ongoing matter. Submissions: Approved submissions are retained permanently as part of the public archive for as long as they remain published. Rejected or withdrawn submissions are deleted within 90 days. Appeals: Appeal records, including supporting evidence and reviewer notes, are retained for 2 years from the date of resolution. Technical logs: Server logs are automatically purged after 30 days.

4. Data Sharing

Your personal information is accessible only to authorised Daag moderators who need it to perform their moderation duties. We do not sell, rent, or share your personal data with any third party.

Approved archive entries (which contain public Facebook comments, not private data) are visible to all platform users by design. Submitter contact information is never displayed publicly. We may disclose information if required by law or to protect the safety of individuals, but we will resist overbroad requests and notify affected users where legally permitted.

5. Screenshots & Evidence

Screenshots submitted as evidence are stored securely and reviewed by our moderation team before publication. All submitted media is verified for authenticity. Screenshots of public Facebook comments are published as part of approved archive entries.

We do not accept or publish screenshots containing private messages, closed-group content, or any material not from publicly visible posts. If a screenshot is found to contain personal information beyond the public comment (such as phone numbers or addresses visible in the background), that information will be redacted before publication.

6. Cookies & Tracking

Daag uses Supabase for backend services, which may set functional cookies necessary for the platform to operate (such as session management). We also use Google Analytics (GA4) to collect anonymous, aggregated website usage data — such as page views, session duration, and general geographic region — to help us understand how visitors interact with the platform and improve the user experience.

Google Analytics may set cookies to distinguish unique users and sessions. No personally identifiable information is collected or shared through Google Analytics. We do not use third-party advertising trackers or social media pixels. The submission-related analytics displayed on our platform are computed entirely from our own database. For more information on how Google processes data, visit Google's Privacy Policy.

7. Your Rights

You have the right to: Access any personal data we hold about you; Correction of inaccurate personal information; Deletion of your personal data (such as contact form messages or submitter email addresses); and Objection to processing of your data in certain circumstances.

To exercise any of these rights, please submit a request through our contact page. We will respond to all legitimate requests within 30 days. Note that deletion requests regarding approved archive entries (which document public comments) will be handled through the formal appeals process.

8. Children's Privacy

Daag is not intended for use by individuals under the age of 16. We do not knowingly collect personal information from children. If we become aware that we have inadvertently collected data from a child under 16, we will take steps to delete that information promptly.

If you believe a child has submitted personal information to Daag, please contact us immediately so we can address the situation.

9. Changes to This Policy

We may update this Privacy Policy from time to time to reflect changes in our practices, technology, or legal requirements. When we make material changes, we will post a notice on the platform and update the "Last updated" date below.

Continued use of the platform after changes are posted constitutes acceptance of the revised policy. We encourage you to review this page periodically.

10. Contact Us

If you have questions about this Privacy Policy, wish to exercise your data rights, or have concerns about how your information is handled, please reach out through our contact page.

We take all privacy inquiries seriously and will respond as promptly as possible.

Last updated: June 2, 2026. This policy applies to all users of the Daag platform.

Contact Us

Have a question, concern, or suggestion? Use the form below to reach the Daag team. We review all messages and will respond where appropriate.

Send a Message
All fields are required. We do not publish your email or personal details.
Maximum 5,000 characters
Your message is sent securely and only visible to moderators.
×Screenshot evidence